|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
2005 Membership |
|
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
08/19/05 |
|
|
|
3 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
0 |
|
District |
|
|
|
Post/District |
|
5 |
0 |
|
Position |
|
|
|
Reached |
|
|
6 |
0 |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
7 |
0 |
|
District # 1 |
1st Place |
Post All |
|
Delegates |
|
Needed To |
|
Membership |
|
|
Date |
|
8 |
0 |
|
|
|
Time High |
Delegates |
At large |
Total |
Make Goal |
2005 Goal |
To Date |
Percent |
|
|
|
9 |
0 |
|
4 Keene |
|
1195 |
12 |
2 |
14 |
-96 |
715 |
811 |
113.43% |
#8 |
11/02/04 |
|
10 |
0 |
|
11 Jaffrey |
|
462 |
8 |
2 |
10 |
-25 |
432 |
457 |
105.79% |
#18 |
12/13/04 |
|
11 |
0 |
|
24 Marlboro |
|
157 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
-3 |
77 |
80 |
103.90% |
#25 |
02/01/05 |
|
12 |
0 |
|
38 Fitzwilliam |
|
65 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
-12 |
39 |
51 |
130.77% |
#6 |
10/25/04 |
|
13 |
0 |
|
44 Winchester |
|
160 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
34 |
33 |
97.06% |
|
|
|
14 |
0 |
|
45 Hinsdale |
|
80 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
26 |
22 |
84.62% |
|
|
|
15 |
2 |
|
56 Troy |
|
89 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
31 |
30 |
96.77% |
|
|
|
16 |
2 |
|
57 Alstead |
|
86 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
81 |
76 |
93.83% |
|
|
|
17 |
2 |
|
77 Walpole |
|
127 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
79 |
77 |
97.47% |
|
|
|
18 |
2 |
|
84 Swanzey |
|
169 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
18 |
61 |
43 |
70.49% |
|
|
|
19 |
2 |
|
85 Gilsum |
|
124 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
11 |
104 |
93 |
89.42% |
|
|
|
20 |
2 |
|
86 Chesterfield |
|
81 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
38 |
34 |
89.47% |
|
|
|
21 |
2 |
|
District # 1 Total |
2795 |
43 |
4 |
47 |
-90 |
1717 |
1807 |
105.24% |
# 1 |
02/04/05 |
|
22 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
2 |
|
District # 2 |
8th Place |
Post All |
|
Delegates |
|
Needed To |
|
Membership |
|
|
|
|
25 |
2 |
|
|
|
Time High |
Delegates |
At large |
Total |
Make Goal |
2005 Goal |
To Date |
Percent |
|
|
|
26 |
2 |
|
3 Nashua |
|
1582 |
12 |
3 |
15 |
-40 |
800 |
840 |
105.00% |
#35 |
03/23/05 |
|
27 |
2 |
|
5 Peterborough |
|
204 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
23 |
110 |
87 |
79.09% |
|
|
|
28 |
2 |
|
10 Wilton |
|
215 |
5 |
1 |
6 |
38 |
197 |
159 |
80.71% |
|
|
|
29 |
2 |
|
13 Greenville |
|
281 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
11 |
208 |
197 |
94.71% |
|
|
|
30 |
2 |
|
23 Milford |
|
408 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
23 |
396 |
373 |
94.19% |
|
|
|
31 |
2 |
|
48 Hudson |
|
793 |
10 |
3 |
13 |
150 |
756 |
606 |
80.16% |
|
|
|
32 |
2 |
|
50 Antrim |
|
175 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
78 |
78 |
100.00% |
#39 |
04/06/05 |
|
33 |
2 |
|
65 Weare |
|
237 |
6 |
1 |
7 |
-12 |
216 |
228 |
105.56% |
#21 |
01/11/05 |
|
34 |
2 |
|
74 Brookline |
|
71 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
-7 |
28 |
35 |
125.00% |
#11 |
12/20/04 |
|
35 |
2 |
|
98 Merrimack |
|
323 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
-13 |
300 |
313 |
104.33% |
#31 |
03/02/05 |
|
36 |
2 |
|
116 Dunbarton |
|
57 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
-1 |
45 |
46 |
102.22% |
#3 |
09/08/04 |
|
37 |
2 |
|
District # 2 Total |
|
4346 |
61 |
8 |
61 |
172 |
3134 |
2962 |
94.51% |
|
|
|
38 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
2 |
|
District # 3 |
3rd Place |
Post All |
|
Delegates |
|
Needed To |
|
Membership |
|
|
|
|
42 |
2 |
|
|
|
Time High |
Delegates |
At large |
Total |
Make Goal |
2005 Goal |
To Date |
Percent |
|
|
|
43 |
2 |
|
6 Portsmouth |
|
871 |
11 |
0 |
11 |
-60 |
700 |
760 |
108.57% |
#33 |
03/15/05 |
|
44 |
2 |
|
7 Rochester |
|
766 |
11 |
2 |
13 |
-147 |
627 |
774 |
123.44% |
#12 |
12/28/04 |
|
45 |
2 |
|
8 Dover |
|
837 |
9 |
3 |
12 |
-37 |
535 |
572 |
106.92% |
#27 |
02/17/05 |
|
46 |
2 |
|
32 Exeter |
|
424 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
-3 |
327 |
330 |
100.92% |
#37 |
04/06/05 |
|
47 |
2 |
|
35 Hampton |
|
293 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
9 |
265 |
256 |
96.60% |
|
|
|
48 |
2 |
|
47 Rollinsford |
|
741 |
10 |
2 |
12 |
75 |
663 |
588 |
88.69% |
|
|
|
49 |
2 |
|
51 Epping |
|
421 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
49 |
351 |
302 |
86.04% |
|
|
|
50 |
2 |
|
60 Farmington |
|
232 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
-2 |
112 |
114 |
101.79% |
#42 |
5/13/05 |
|
51 |
2 |
|
61 Milton |
|
103 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
-9 |
98 |
107 |
109.18% |
#5 |
10/01/04 |
|
52 |
2 |
|
67 Newmarket |
|
529 |
9 |
3 |
12 |
-1 |
502 |
503 |
100.20% |
|
|
|
53 |
2 |
|
69 Somersworth |
|
473 |
7 |
1 |
8 |
46 |
379 |
333 |
87.86% |
|
|
|
54 |
2 |
|
70 Seabrook |
|
332 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
319 |
309 |
96.87% |
|
|
|
55 |
2 |
|
73 Northwood |
|
122 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
22 |
20 |
90.91% |
|
|
|
56 |
2 |
|
94 Durham |
|
68 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
22 |
10 |
45.45% |
|
|
|
57 |
2 |
|
105 Kensington |
|
137 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
80 |
72 |
90.00% |
|
|
|
58 |
2 |
|
113 New Durham |
87 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
27 |
19 |
70.37% |
|
|
|
59 |
2 |
|
114 Barrington |
|
100 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
84 |
74 |
88.10% |
|
|
|
60 |
2 |
|
District # 3 Total |
6536 |
102 |
11 |
113 |
-30 |
5113 |
5143 |
100.59% |
|
08/09/05 |
|
61 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
2 |
|
District # 4 |
6th Place |
Post All |
|
Delegates |
|
Needed To |
|
Membership |
|
|
|
|
64 |
2 |
|
|
Time High |
Delegates |
At large |
Total |
Make Goal |
2005 Goal |
To Date |
Percent |
|
|
|
65 |
2 |
|
2 Manchester |
|
1376 |
17 |
2 |
19 |
-99 |
1288 |
1387 |
107.69% |
#20 |
12/30/04 |
|
66 |
2 |
|
9 Derry |
|
554 |
7 |
3 |
10 |
49 |
420 |
371 |
88.33% |
|
|
|
67 |
2 |
|
16 Goffstown |
|
104 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
25 |
24 |
96.00% |
|
|
|
68 |
2 |
|
27 Londonderry |
301 |
7 |
1 |
8 |
-44 |
260 |
304 |
116.92% |
#17 |
12/30/04 |
|
69 |
2 |
|
34 Plaistow |
|
433 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
-2 |
358 |
360 |
100.56% |
#45 |
05/27/05 |
|
70 |
2 |
|
37 Hooksett |
|
278 |
7 |
1 |
8 |
-31 |
265 |
296 |
111.70% |
#16 |
12/30/04 |
|
71 |
2 |
|
43 Manchester |
|
1524 |
7 |
1 |
8 |
18 |
390 |
372 |
95.38% |
|
|
|
72 |
2 |
|
54 Bedford |
|
122 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
-3 |
47 |
50 |
106.38% |
#30 |
02/28/05 |
|
73 |
2 |
|
63 Salem |
|
211 |
6 |
1 |
7 |
-21 |
190 |
211 |
111.05% |
#19 |
12/30/04 |
|
74 |
2 |
|
79 Manchester |
|
1321 |
11 |
2 |
13 |
277 |
990 |
713 |
72.02% |
|
|
|
75 |
2 |
|
90 Raymond |
|
79 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
-45 |
50 |
95 |
190.00% |
#2 |
08/26/04 |
|
76 |
2 |
|
91 Candia |
|
87 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
80 |
76 |
95.00% |
|
|
|
77 |
2 |
|
100 Pelham |
|
304 |
6 |
1 |
7 |
19 |
260 |
241 |
92.69% |
|
|
|
78 |
2 |
|
108 Chester |
|
81 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
32 |
32 |
100.00% |
#29 |
02/07/05 |
|
79 |
2 |
|
109 Windham |
|
95 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
-10 |
40 |
50 |
125.00% |
#10 |
11/29/04 |
|
80 |
2 |
|
115 Danville |
|
70 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
-3 |
58 |
61 |
105.17% |
#34 |
03/18/05 |
|
81 |
2 |
|
District # 4 Total |
|
6940 |
92 |
12 |
104 |
110 |
4753 |
4643 |
97.69% |
|
|
|
82 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
2 |
|
District # 5 |
4th Place |
Post All |
|
Delegates |
|
Needed To |
|
Membership |
|
|
|
|
85 |
2 |
|
|
|
Time High |
Delegates |
At large |
Total |
Make Goal |
2005 Goal |
To Date |
Percent |
|
|
|
86 |
2 |
|
21 Concord |
|
1240 |
10 |
1 |
11 |
-55 |
540 |
595 |
110.19% |
#13 |
12/30/04 |
|
87 |
2 |
|
28 Suncook |
|
384 |
6 |
3 |
9 |
56 |
250 |
194 |
77.60% |
|
|
|
88 |
2 |
|
31 Penacook |
|
329 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
-21 |
171 |
192 |
112.28% |
#23 |
1/27/05 |
|
89 |
2 |
|
39 Warner |
|
153 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
-3 |
96 |
99 |
103.13% |
|
|
|
90 |
2 |
|
42 Barnstead |
|
88 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
-15 |
73 |
88 |
120.55% |
#40 |
04/11/05 |
|
91 |
2 |
|
59 Hillsboro |
|
494 |
8 |
1 |
9 |
9 |
476 |
467 |
98.11% |
|
|
|
92 |
2 |
|
75 Pittsfield |
|
121 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
10 |
68 |
58 |
85.29% |
|
|
|
93 |
2 |
|
81 Contoocook |
|
327 |
6 |
0 |
6 |
16 |
202 |
186 |
92.08% |
#22 |
01/06/04 |
|
94 |
2 |
|
88 Loudon |
|
87 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
-6 |
62 |
68 |
109.68% |
#7 |
10/28/04 |
|
95 |
2 |
|
103 Deerfield |
|
149 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
15 |
81 |
66 |
81.48% |
|
|
|
96 |
2 |
|
112 Epsom |
|
144 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
3 |
126 |
123 |
97.62% |
|
|
|
97 |
2 |
|
122 Concord |
|
79 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
-27 |
64 |
91 |
142.19% |
#4 |
09/20/04 |
|
98 |
2 |
|
District # 5 Total |
3595 |
56 |
5 |
61 |
-18 |
2209 |
2227 |
100.81% |
|
08/09/05 |
|
99 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
3 |
|
District # 6 |
5th Place |
Post All |
|
Delegates |
|
Needed To |
|
Membership |
|
|
|
|
102 |
3 |
|
|
Time High |
Delegates |
At large |
Total |
Make Goal |
2005 Goal |
To Date |
Percent |
|
|
|
103 |
3 |
|
22 Lebanon |
|
592 |
9 |
0 |
9 |
-14 |
551 |
565 |
102.54% |
#44 |
05/19/05 |
|
104 |
3 |
|
25 Newport |
|
383 |
6 |
1 |
7 |
-11 |
224 |
235 |
104.91% |
#28 |
02/17/05 |
|
105 |
3 |
|
29 Claremont |
|
699 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
44 |
390 |
346 |
88.72% |
|
|
|
106 |
3 |
|
40 New London |
|
198 |
6 |
3 |
9 |
-1 |
185 |
186 |
100.54% |
|
|
|
107 |
3 |
|
53 Charlestown |
|
176 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
-10 |
47 |
57 |
121.28% |
#15 |
12/30/04 |
|
108 |
3 |
|
55 Canaan |
|
68 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
-18 |
58 |
76 |
131.03% |
#9 |
11/01/04 |
|
109 |
3 |
|
72 Hanover |
|
66 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
21 |
12 |
57.14% |
|
|
|
110 |
3 |
|
80 Lyme |
|
113 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
40 |
34 |
85.00% |
|
|
|
111 |
3 |
|
96 Danbury |
|
42 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
21 |
12 |
57.14% |
|
|
|
112 |
3 |
|
97 Grafton |
|
41 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
30 |
25 |
83.33% |
|
|
|
113 |
3 |
|
101 Andover |
|
71 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
25 |
18 |
72.00% |
|
|
|
114 |
3 |
|
117 Sunapee |
|
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
21 |
19 |
90.48% |
|
|
|
115 |
3 |
|
District # 6 Total |
|
2449 |
40 |
4 |
44 |
28 |
1613 |
1585 |
98.26% |
|
|
|
116 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|